This is a true copy of KC2000 forum thread "Stringybark Creek Heritage" copied before it was trashed by disgruntled forum members.
The reason we show this thread is because forum KC2000 has recently restricted public access and now YOU have to be a member to read it. This I believe is outside
the spirit of the original forum postings. To ensure unrestricted public access including the external links, here below is a copy.
The original thread is at http://kellycountry2000.forumco.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=754  By comparison notice half is missing. To date this thread had 572 reads.
Bill Denheld

SBC Heritage Listed

 
Author Topic  
robert mcgarrigle
Advanced Member
 


Australia
73 Posts

Posted - 10/09/2009 :  5:55:36 PM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Hi members, I have briefly come out of hibernation to let you know that the 2 sites at SBC were officially heritage listed today. I have sent the article to Bruce so he can post it here. It is in the late news in the SMH.com.au website if you cannot wait to look at it.

Regards Bob

Edited by - robert mcgarrigle on 10/09/2009 5:56:36 PM

Sharon Hollingsworth
Advanced Member
 



USA
462 Posts

Posted - 10/09/2009 :  6:22:20 PM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Here is a link to an article about it that just arrived via google alerts..

http://livenews.com.au/news/kelly-gang-sites-get-heritagelisted/2009/9/10/218993

Sharon

Added Comment, this above link no longer works, Bill Denheld
Go to Top of Page
Joe.D
Advanced Member
 



Australia
547 Posts

Posted - 29/09/2009 :  12:32:08 PM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
All,

http://vhd.heritage.vic.gov.au/places/heritage/13107

Joe.D
Go to Top of Page
robert mcgarrigle
Advanced Member
 



Australia
73 Posts

Posted - 29/09/2009 :  2:29:41 PM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Many thanks for the link Joe, I am sure Bill will be happy to read this article. The surveyors map of 1884 clearly shows the shootout site was on the west bank, I would find it hard to believe that a surveyor would get it wrong although possible I guess. McIntyre clearly said that the creek was 70 yards or metres? to the east of where the police tent was hitched. If both these descriptions are correct the current site is definitely the wrong site and maybe awhile before the correct site is confirmed if ever.
Go to Top of Page
Joe.D
Advanced Member
 



Australia
547 Posts

Posted - 29/09/2009 :  5:10:52 PM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Hi Rob,

Yeap no probs........ I have no doubt with the likes of Linton Briggs, Bill Denheld and Kel Gill will definitely bring us without doubt a close approximation of the true site of the police camp. I imagine we have a long wait whilst the research is being conducted.....perhaps Bill or Kel could fill us in with the latest???

Joe.D
Go to Top of Page
bill denheld
Advanced Member
 



Australia
85 Posts

Posted - 11/10/2009 :  09:50:57 AM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit bill denheld's Homepage  Edit Reply  Reply with Quote  Delete Reply
Thank you Joe, Robert, Sharon and all.
As you are aware there is a concerted effort to prove the location of the Police/Kelly shoot out site.

Kelvyn's detective like research had identified a second McIntyre sketch that the Police Historical Unit was supposed to have. His persistent request to find the sketch led to archivist curator Liz Marsden finding of a sketch similar to the one we are all familiar with which shows two logs, a fire, where Lonigan was shot and fell, from where the Kellys came and a compass bearing. However this new found sketch does show the relative position of the police tent. Well done Kelvyn.

Forum members, You can help.

From all the evidence we know the Kellys advanced into the police camp from the South.
We know Ned Kelly used a Burman produced Post Card of the scene at his Beechworth Preliminary trial.
The reason Ned used the post card was because he could show to the magistrate they did not ambush the camp, rather they ( four men ) approached the camp in a line from one direction, supposedly from between two trees within that photo.


Can anyone direct us to a transcript of the Beechworth prelim trial, and wherein Ned uses the Burman photo to show from where they came.

Your help will be greatly appreciated.
With the weather slowly improving further site meetings are planned.

http://www.ironicon.com.au/stringybarkckinvestigation.htm

 
Go to Top of Page
kellycountry2000
Forum Admin
 



Australia
512 Posts

Posted - 11/10/2009 :  11:30:40 AM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote




Extent of Registration

1. All of the land marked L1 on Diagram2205 held by the Executive Director being an area of approximately 28 hectares bounded on the west by Stringybark Creek Road and to the north by the Tatong-Tolmie Road and to the east by a bush track which runs more or less parallel to Stringybark Creek and to the south by the 800m contour line and being part of Crown Allotment 38A Parish of Toombullup.
Statement of Significance

What is significant?

Stringybark Creek was the location where three police officers were shot and killed by Ned Kelly on 26 October 1878. Following the deaths of the Mansfield police officers Lonigan, Scanlan and Kennedy, the Kelly Gang became the most wanted outlaws in Australia in the late 19th century. The shootings at Stringybark Creek precipitated the events of the Kelly Outbreak, which reached a climax at Glenrowan in June 1880.

The Stringybark Creek site consists of swampy ground, ferns and speargrass along Stringybark Creek, rising to a timbered woodland of gum and blackwood. The area has a rich timber harvesting and mining history, and remnant gold workings and open shafts are visible across the site. The archaeological ruins of two miner's huts are located on the west bank of the creek, between the creek and Stringybark Creek Road.

The site includes the "Kelly tree" in which the names of the three police officers were carved in the early 1930s. An iron helmet has been set into the scar of the tree, which has now been obscured by the tree's regrowth. A stone memorial with a plaque dedicated to Sergeant Michael Kennedy, Constable Michael Scanlan and Constable Thomas Lonigan was unveiled on the site on 26 October 2001.

A number of historical documents exist which provide evidence for the location of the Stringybark Creek site. The site location is shown on an 1884 surveyor's plan, marked "Scene of the Police murders by the Kelly Gang". The plan also shows a hut on the opposite (west) bank of the creek, which may correlate with the archaeological hut remains that survive. The site is depicted in a photograph taken by the police a few weeks after the shootings.

How is it significant?

The Stringybark Creek site is of historical and archaeological significance to the State of Victoria.

Why is it significant?

The Stringybark Creek site is historically significant as the place where an encounter between the Kelly Gang and the police took place which resulted in the death of three police officers, and the gang being declared outlaws. It was for the murder of Constable Thomas Lonigan at Stringybark Creek that Ned Kelly was found guilty and hanged in November 1880. Following the events at Stringybark Creek a reward of 100 pounds was posted for the capture of Ned Kelly. The reward for the capture of the gang members rose to 8000 pounds by the time of the Glenrowan siege.

Stringybark Creek is archaeologically significant for its potential to contain archaeological artefacts and deposits that relate to the police shootings.

ASSESSMENT AGAINST CRITERIA

a. Importance to the course, or pattern, of Victoria's cultural history

The Stringybark Creek site is important to Victoria's cultural history as the place where the events of the exchange between the Kelly Gang and the police escalated, leading to the issuing of large rewards for the capture of the bushrangers, an extensive police hunt which culminated in the dramatic siege event at Glenrowan, and the hanging of Ned Kelly in 1880 at the Old Melbourne Gaol.

b. Possession of uncommon, rare or endangered aspects of Victoria's cultural history.

N/A

c. Potential to yield information that will contribute to an understanding of Victoria's cultural history.

The Stringybark Creek site has the potential to contain historical archaeological deposits and objects, including ballistics, that relate to the events of the shoot-out.

d. Importance in demonstrating the principal characteristics of a class of cultural places or environments.

N/A

e. Importance in exhibiting particular aesthetic characteristics.

N/A

f. Importance in demonstrating a high degree of creative or technical achievement at a particular period.

N/A

g. Strong or special association with a particular community or cultural group for social, cultural or spiritual reasons. This includes the significance of a place to Indigenous peoples as part of their continuing and developing cultural traditions.

N/A

h. Special association with the life or works of a person, or group of persons, of importance in Victoria's history.

The Stringybark Creek site is strongly associated with the members of the Kelly Gang (Ned Kelly, Dan Kelly, Joe Byrne and Steve Hart), and with the four police officers (Thomas Lonigan, Michael Scanlan, Michael Kennedy and Thomas McIntyre) who fought the bushrangers at the site.
Go to Top of Page
bill denheld
Advanced Member
 



Australia
85 Posts

Posted - 12/10/2009 :  6:32:55 PM  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit bill denheld's Homepage  Edit Reply  Reply with Quote  Delete Reply
Bruce, thanks for posting this information.

All will see the yellow indicates the portion of land under the Heritage Victoria listing. Also, the area around Kellys creek is covered.

Ongoing research west of and on the road boundary (as shown) is not currently covered. I spoke to Heritage about this as the original nomination included all the ground between the two creeks. Heritage said as soon as we want the boundary changed they will do it. This is in reference to Linton's suggestion that the police camp site was infact west of the road with the Burman photo looking South.

However, as can be seen on webpage http://www.ironicon.com.au/stringybarkckinvestigation.htm in this direction there is insufficient rising ground to support the rise in the Burman photo and hence Linton feels strongly the Burman photo view could be looking East**. He also believes my plot of 804 M to the hut site on the 1884 map coincides with his long belief this was the site but west of the road.

It is hoped forum members can help in the discussions to do with the quest to identify the true site.

Also Bruce, looking at your interesting webpage references to McIntyre's notes re 70 yards from the creek and my reference to 804 metres from the junction of S/bark and Ryans Cks, 804m is only my reckoning from the junction using the maps available - to where the 1884 surveyor plotted a hut on that map. This hut plot was six years after the event, so it could have been a new hut or one of the remaining Two huts wrongly plotted on the map because there were no other datum points except for the junction of the two creeks.

** I mention as well that from this location looking East there is still no rising ground as in the Burman photo, except for the ground that rises on the other side of the creek (East bank) is about 130 metres (or 430 feet) too far from the west bank road site.

see panorama and Burman photo http://www.ironicon.com.au/nearkellytree/nearkellytree.html

In the Burman photo you will notice there does not appear to be a creek depression near the big tree on the right or immediatly behind it.


 

Edited by - bill denheld on 13/10/2009 08:48:31 AM